How I solved the Mystery Of Creation
It is time to set the record straight. Some say the idea that a universe can create itself should be rejected because it is self-contradictory. They should have been more careful when they used the law of non- contradiction (Aristotle) against our theory. Like a Python the law can twist itself around and squeeze our competition out of existence. Interestingly, the reasoning they used for the claim against self creating universe is that for a thing to create itself it had to exist before it existed. Although this statement is absolutely true it does not apply to our theory. We have passed this stage of thought a long time ago. Conversely, the law does apply directly to both Religion and The Big Bang Theory. One of the first issues to address is that the self creating universe is not at all about gaining something from nothing. The statement in one of our books 'how do you get something from nothing?" was specifically put there to call attention to the fact it is impossible to get something from nothing. Creation began in another way and from a place never suspected. To the point: By raising the question of contradiction against self creating universe, our competition has trapped themselves. Self-contradiction directly applies to the questions, "'If a god created, who created God and from what?" "From what was the incredibility dense dot (the Plank Era)
made and how was it made?" The statement "from what" is now forever out in the open, it can not be avoided and it opens a Pandora's box of a thousand questions that the opposition can not answer. Conversely, self-creation as it applies to the beginning of cosmic evolution does provide answers and we welcome all questions about our work. It is obvious that what was first in being needs to be clearly identified. Our universe is an after the fact by-product of two separate and individual events that occurred before us. First in being was (and still is) the original cosmos. This cosmos possesses one force and one force only. No physical laws yet existed and neither did our universe. The original cosmos was both eternal and infinite in distance for the following reason. Original space did not need to be created by virtue of the fact that there is nothing that could replace it and because everything, everywhere was the same. The repulsion force that the original cosmos possessed could not expand because literally there was no place into which it could go thus the original cosmos had to remain static. A critical point that one must understand is that the original cosmos was not vacuum space. Vacuum space must be created. Again, in the original cosmos, there was not yet any way to process such things. So, even though the original cosmos always possessed the fuel of potential energy, it had to stand in silence waiting until an identifiable process began that triggered the original force to split into two opposite forces. This created a new cosmos and most importantly, kinetic energy. And so the force of attraction was born i.e. the needed magic ingredient for cosmic evolution to proceed which could now process dark space into the nuclear forces necessary for the creation of our universe. No creator was involved. We now exist. All of the above is discussed in greater detail in the book "How I Solved the Mystery Of Creation" ® by Bruce Terry.
How I solved the mystery of creation by
Bruce Terry @ 2007
Published by
Dark Space Cosmos
will be available for purchase soon